On appeal from a sentence of ten years and eight months imprisonment, appellant Michael Young contends that the trial court erred in using a 1974 prison term to enhance his sentence, because he had been free of custody for over five years. He also argues that imposition of an enhancement in this case thwarted the legislative intent underlying Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b),
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. YOUNG
Docket No. A034114.
192 Cal.App.3d 812 (1987)
237 Cal. Rptr. 703
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL YOUNG, Defendant and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 15, 1987.
June 15, 1987.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Frieda Jo Owings, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Steve White, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Ann K. Jensen and Cynthia Choy Ong, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
