1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 119 A.D.2d
  5. 119 A.D.2d 879 (1986)
 

PROSKIN & LAVIGNE v. 41 STATE OFFICE INVESTORS, INC.

119 A.D.2d 879 (1986)

Proskin & Lavigne, P. C., as Successor in Interest to Arnold W. Proskin, P. C., Respondent, v. 41 State Office Investors, Inc., as Successor in Interest to MacFarland Construction Company, Inc., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

April 3, 1986

The preliminary injunction was properly granted (see, Herzfeld & Stern v Ironwood Realty Corp., 102 A.D.2d 737; Grand Liberte Coop. v Bilhaud, 126 Misc.2d 961, 963-964). Contrary to defendant's suggestion, the merits of the underlying action must be addressed by the court of original jurisdiction and not by this court in the first instance. The order should be affirmed.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases