1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 510 A.2d
  5. 510 A.2d 487 (1986)
 

PABST BREWING CO. v. JOHN I. HAAS, INC.

510 A.2d 487 (1986)

PABST BREWING COMPANY, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. JOHN I. HAAS, INC. and John Barth Incorporated, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees, v. LUPOFRESH, INC., Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: June 17, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter M. Sieglaff, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Thomas G.A. Herz and R. Jeffrey Krill (argued), Michael, Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, Wis., of counsel, for appellant.

Irving Morris and Kevin Gross, Morris and Rosenthal, P.A., Wilmington, Merrill G. Davidoff (argued), David Berger, H. Laddie Montague, Jr., Daniel Berger, and Alan M. Sandals, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel, for appellees John I. Haas, Inc. and John Barth Incorporated.

John A. Parkins, Jr., Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Eugene Mittelman (argued), and Robert Fierman, Dreyer and Traub, New York City, of counsel, for appellee Lupofresh, Inc.

Before McNEILLY, HORSEY and MOORE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the trial court, see Lupofresh, Inc. v. Pabst Brewing Company, Inc., Del. Super., 505 A.2d 37 (1985), the judgment is hereby

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases