1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 785 F.2d
  5. 785 F.2d 206 (1986)
 

UNITED STATES v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND CO.

No. 85-1050.

785 F.2d 206 (1986)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY and Nabisco Brands, Inc., Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided February 24, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Donohoe, Washington, D.C., for Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.

J. Randolph Wilson, Washington, D.C., for Nabisco Brands.

Margaret G. Halpern, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, ROSS and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from a civil antitrust suit brought by the Government against the Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Nabisco Brands, Inc. (Nabisco). ADM and Nabisco moved for dismissal, or for alternative relief, on the ground that the Government violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e), the rule protecting the secrecy of grand jury proceedings. The district court1 denied their motion and this appeal followed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases