Order affirmed, with costs.
Special Term did not abuse its discretion in permitting the plaintiff to serve her bill of particulars despite her default and the existence of a conditional order of preclusion. The plaintiff was unaware that her first attorney, who commenced the action, failed to submit a bill of particulars and failed to comply with the conditional order of preclusion. It also appears that that attorney was suspended from the practice of law in early...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
