A review of the record reveals that respondent's resolution of the credibility issue presented to it is supported by substantial evidence. In particular, the testimony of David Brocco and Tomi Tompkins provides sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that petitioner violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65 (1). Accordingly, we may not disturb respondent's determination (see, Matter of Di Maria v Ross,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF OSTER v. NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTH.
125 A.D.2d 859 (1986)
In the Matter of Larry A. Oster et al., Doing Business as Sum Place, Petitioners, v. New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 24, 1986
December 24, 1986
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
