1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 670 F.Supp.
  5. 670 F.Supp. 306 (1986)
 

U.S. v. AAM

Nos. C82-1522V, C821549V.

670 F.Supp. 306 (1986)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Dorwin AAM, et al., Defendants. SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff, v. Dorwin AAM, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington.

May 20, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Pacheco, Dept. of Justice, Land and Natural Resources Div., Indian Resources Section, Washington, D.C., F. Patrick Barry, Dept. of Justice, Land and Natural Resources Div., Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff U.S.

Alexandra Harmon, Suquamish, Wash., for plaintiff Suquamish Indian Tribe.

John Roberts, Eric Richter, Skeel, Henke, Evenson & Roberts, Seattle, Wash., Reinhold Schuetz, Deputy Pros. Atty., Port Orchard, Wash., J. Lawrence Coniff, Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Wash., Philip P. Malone, Poulsbo, Wash., Steven C. Marshall, Perkins Coie, Bellevue, Wash.

ORDER

VOORHEES, District Judge.

Having considered the motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment and the cross-motion of defendants for summary judgment, together with the memoranda, affidavits and exhibits submitted by counsel, the Court now finds and rules as follows:

1. Plaintiffs previously filed a motion to preclude litigation of certain issues. That motion raised substantially the same questions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases