BONGARD v. BONGARD

No. C5-85-1227.

380 N.W.2d 592 (1986)

Marilyn V. BONGARD, Respondent, v. Frederick H. BONGARD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied March 27, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce P. Wyant, Samuel C. Tripp, Wyant & Morgeson, P.A., Bloomington, for respondent.

Robert A. Nicklaus, Mary Kendall Adler, Nicklaus, Monroe, Fahey & Cooper, Chaska, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and FORSBERG and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.


OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This appeal is from an order denying a motion for a new trial following entry of judgment for respondent in her action for fraud brought against her former husband. We reverse.

FACTS

Many of the facts of this case are stated in a prior appeal, Bongard v. Bongard, 342 N.W.2d 156 (Minn.Ct.App.1983), which involved an attachment order in this action.

Respondent Marilyn...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases