1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 56 B.R.
  5. 56 B.R. 910 (1986)
 

IN RE FLAGSTAFF FOODSERVICE CORP.

Bankruptcy Nos. 81 B 11430(PBA) to 81 B 11436 (PBA).

56 B.R. 910 (1986)

In re FLAGSTAFF FOODSERVICE CORPORATION, et. al., Debtor.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York.

January 15, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raff, Scheider & Weiner, Newark, N.J., for Gen. Elec. Credit Corp.

Angel & Frankel, P.C., New York City, for Creditors Committee.

George Wilding, Gen. Credit Manager, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., for Best Foods Intern. Plaza.

Levin & Weintraub & Crames, New York City, for debtor in possession.

Robert Fisher, Fisher, Hecht & Fisher, New York City, Trustee.

Anderson, Russell, Kill & Olick, P.C., New York City, for Bruno Scheidt, Inc.

Lanshe, Lanshe & Lanshe, Allentown, Pa., for Stewart Sandwiches, Inc.

Bernstein, Weiss, Coplan, Weinsten & Lake, New York City, for Schoenfeld & Sons, Inc.

Scheider & Arzt, New York City, for Hunter Walton & Co., Inc. and Walker Butter & Egg Co., Inc.

Sahn, Luks & Gillman, New York City, for Economy Meats, Inc.

Siegel, Sommers & Schwartz, New York City, for Beatrice Foods Inc.

Lester A. Lazarus, P.C., New York City, for Seamark, Corp.

Ted Bobbey, Pittsburg, Pa., for Heinz USA.

Guterman, Horvits, Rubin & Rudman, Boston, Mass., for Intern. Ice Cream Corp.

Scheider & Wiener, Newark, N.J., for Western Idaho Potato Processing Co.

Powers & Hall, Boston, Mass., for Slade Gorton & Co., Inc.

Robert M. Vorsauger, New York City, for Amstar Corp.

R.D. Ruiz, Credit Manager, Oakland, Cal., for Clorox Co.

Adler Pollock & Sheehan, New York City, for Juice Services, Inc.

Iannucciclo & Hines, Inc., Providence, R.I., for Roger Williams Food, Inc.

E. Spier, Carlstadt, N.J., for Spear Packing Corp.

Bruce M. Roswick, New York City, for Western Idaho Potato Processing Co.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

PRUDENCE B. ABRAM, Bankruptcy Judge.

By motion and application filed October 31, 1983 General Electric Credit Corporation ("GECC") sought, in the alternative; (1) the reconsideration of eleven reclamation claims which were previously allowed by various orders of this court, or (2) the vacature of seven orders allowing various sellers' reclamation claims.1 The gravamen of GECC's application is that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases