1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 392 N.W.2d
  5. 392 N.W.2d 574 (1986)
 

NETZ v. STATE

No. C5-86-699.

392 N.W.2d 574 (1986)

William J. NETZ, petitioner, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied October 17, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, Mark F. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, Hennepin Co. Atty., Paul R. Jennings, Asst. Co. Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and HUSPENI and CRIPPEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant contends that the receipt by the police of his statement and his consent for an ensuing search were the fruit of illegal police conduct and therefore inadmissible as evidence against appellant. Because we find the statement and the search were not the fruit of illegal conduct, we affirm the trial court.

FACTS

In March 1984, the Minneapolis home of Herbert and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases