1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 805 F.2d
  5. 805 F.2d 155 (1986)
 

IN RE ANTITRUST GRAND JURY

Nos. 85-4053, 85-4068.

805 F.2d 155 (1986)

In re ANTITRUST GRAND JURY. ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC.; Plain Dealer Publishing Co.; S.I. Newhouse, Jr., Intervenors-Appellants (85-4053), Cleveland Press Publishing Co. (currently known as the Cleveland Liquidating Trust); Joseph E. Cole; James P. Maloney, Jr., Intervenors-Appellants (85-4068), Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom; and Williams and Connolly, Related Parties-Appellants (85-4068), v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided November 3, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Garner, Jonathan E. Thackeray, David G. Holcome, Baker & Hostetler, Cleveland, Ohio, William E. Willis (argued), Richard J. Urowsky, William R. Petricone, Jr., Sullivan & Cromwell, Sabin, Bermant & Blau, New York City, for intervenors-appellants in No. 85-4053.

Kent Brown, Mark Leddy (argued), Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Div., Washington, D.C., John P. Fonte; John A. Weedon, Marilyn A. Bobula, Michael J. Keane, Dept. of Justice, Cleveland, Ohio, John J. Powers, III, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Richard W. Pogue, William T. Plesec (argued), Stephen J. Squeri, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Cleveland, Ohio, Kenneth A. Bravo, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, Cleveland, Ohio, Shepard Goldfein, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York City, John K. Villa, Williams & Connolly, Washington, D.C., for intervenors-appellants and related parties-appellants in No. 85-4068.

Before JONES and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and GILMORE, District Court Judge.

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from a grand jury investigation into possible antitrust violations in the sale of certain assets of the now defunct Cleveland Press Newspaper to the Plain Dealer Newspaper of Cleveland. Numerous parties, including the newspapers and their representative law firms in the transaction, have appealed an order of the district court denying disclosure of grand jury testimony and compelling production of certain documents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases