WHIRLPOOL CORP. v. CIVIL RIGHTS COMM.

Docket No. 74427, (Calendar No. 10).

425 Mich. 527 (1986)

390 N.W.2d 625

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION v. CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided August 5, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Butzbaugh, Page, Butzbaugh & Dewane (by John E. Dewane) and Matkov, Griffin, Parsons, Salzman & Madoff (by David J. Parsons) for the plaintiff.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, and Felix E. League and Dianne Rubin, Assistant Attorneys General, for the defendants.


BRICKLEY, J.

The facts of this case are set forth in the opinion of Justice ARCHER. The issue presented is whether the Legislature intended the Civil Rights Act to prohibit employers from having "no-spouse rules" in their personnel policies. We recently held that antinepotism policies which prohibit "any relatives (natural or through marriage)" of a current employee from being hired do not constitute discrimination on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases