1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 176 Cal.App.3d
  5. 176 Cal.App.3d 775 (1986)
 

IN RE CONRAD V.

Docket No. B009912.

176 Cal.App.3d 775 (1986)

222 Cal. Rptr. 552

In re CONRAD V., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. WILLIAM FORDEN, as Chief Probation Officer, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CONRAD V., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

January 9, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Linn Davis, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson and Lauren E. Dana, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

ABBE, J.

The minor was found to have been unlawfully carrying a concealed dirk or dagger on his person in violation of Penal Code section 12020, subdivision (a).1 (1a) The sole issue we address is whether the knife-like instrument the minor had is a dirk or dagger within the meaning of that section. We conclude it is not and reverse.

The instrument, a photocopy of which is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases