1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 341 S.E.2d
  5. 341 S.E.2d 608 (1986)
 

COX v. JEFFERSON-PILOT FIRE AND CAS. CO.

No. 8518SC1178.

341 S.E.2d 608 (1986)

Roy A. COX, Jr. v. JEFFERSON-PILOT FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 1, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lunsford & Christy by John W. Lunsford, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant.

Nichols, Caffrey, Hill, Evans & Murrelle by Richard L. Pinto and Richard J. Votta, Greensboro, for defendant-appellee Jefferson-Pilot Fire and Cas. Co.

Hedrick, Eatman, Gardner, & Kincheloe by Mel J. Garofalo and Mika Z. Savir, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

WELLS, Judge.

In his complaint, plaintiff did not identify any specific claim for relief. In his brief, he contends that he has sufficiently alleged claims for abuse of process and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We agree that the complaint is sufficient for the abuse of process claim. However, under the test established by our Supreme Court in Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181, 254 S.E.2d 611 (1979) and

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases