1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 187 Cal.App.3d
  5. 187 Cal.App.3d 760 (1986)
 

CONSIDINE CO. v. SHADLE, HUNT & HAGAR

Docket No. D003506.

187 Cal.App.3d 760 (1986)

232 Cal. Rptr. 250

CONSIDINE COMPANY, INC., et al., Cross-complainants and Appellants, v. SHADLE, HUNT & HAGAR et al., Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

December 3, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Higgs, Fletcher & Mack, Bruce D. Jaques, Jr., and Gregory Y. Lievers for Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Lewis, D'Amato, Brisbois & Bisgaard, Alan E. Greenberg and Patricia E. Mundy for Cross-defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

LEWIS, J.

The Considine Company, Inc., and Considine Vineyard Company, cross-complainants and appellants (Considine), appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their cross-complaint against cross-defendants and respondents Shadle, Hunt & Hagar, Ernest L. Hunt, Jr., and James L. Hagar (SH&H). For the reasons set forth below we must reverse the judgment.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases