Judgment affirmed.
Both the photographic array viewed by the complainant and the circumstances surrounding the viewing thereof were not impermissibly suggestive. Therefore, the trial court did not err in denying that branch of the defendant's motion which was to suppress the in-court identification by the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.