Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Based upon a review of the record, we conclude that the Court of Claims did not abuse its discretion in denying the claimant's application to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6). The claimant failed to present sufficient evidence to establish that the State had notice of the essential facts constituting his claim or that the State had an opportunity to investigate the circumstances...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
