Judgment affirmed.
Although the hearing court suppressed evidence of a showup because it found the showup to be impermissibly suggestive, it was not error for the court to permit one of the complainants to make an in-court identification of the defendant. That complainant's attentive observation of the defendant during the commission of the crime, as evidenced by his accurate description of the defendant, provided an independent basis for the identification (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
