WEBER v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.

Civ. A. Nos. 82-1914, 82-3131, 84-1558, 85-4979 and 84-633.

630 F.Supp. 285 (1986)

Albert WEBER and Jean Weber, Plaintiffs, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Theodore PENNEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Frank SMIGELSKI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, et al., Defendants. Austin WINNICKI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, et al., Defendants. Thomas LENAHAN, Plaintiff, v. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

March 13, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathan A. Friedman, P.A. by Michael S. Berger, Cherry Hill, N.J., for plaintiffs.

Enright, Lenney & McGrath by Michael P. McGrath, Alan G. Swetz, Bloomfield, N.J., for defendant Pacor.

McCarter & English by Andrew T. Berry, Michael A. Tanenbaum, Newark, N.J., for defendants Eagle-Picher, Carey Canada, Celotex, Keene, Owens-Illinois, Armstrong and Pittsburgh-Corning.


OPINION

CLARKSON S. FISHER, Chief Judge.

In these asbestos-related product-liability actions Pacor, Inc., one of many co-defendants, moves for summary judgment dismissing all claims and cross claims against it. Pacor proceeds on the theory that it functioned as nothing more than a "mere broker" in the distribution of certain asbestos products to which plaintiffs allegedly were exposed. Therefore, according to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases