BOWEN v. ARNOLD

No. C8-85-1058.

380 N.W.2d 531 (1986)

Julie M. BOWEN, Appellant, v. David B. ARNOLD, individually, and Arnold & McDowell, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied March 27, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas A. Hedin, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Kenneth W. Dodge, Dianna R. Stallone, Meagher, Geer, Markham, Anderson, Adamson, Flaskamp & Brennan, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and SEDGWICK and LANSING, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal is from an order denying a new trial in a legal malpractice action. The jury found that lawyer David Arnold had not been negligent in representing appellant Julie Spande in a marital dissolution proceeding. We affirm.

FACTS

In early September 1979 Julie Bowen Spande went to the Princeton, Minnesota, office of attorney David Arnold to discuss the possible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases