STATE v. TEIGEN

No. C3-85-1372.

381 N.W.2d 529 (1986)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Kevin Eugene TEIGEN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 18, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Larry Mickelberg, Clay Co. Atty., Donald Shoop, Asst. Co. Atty., Moorhead, for respondent.

Kevin Eugene Teigen, pro se.

Considered and decided by WOZNIAK, P.J., and SEDGWICK and FORSBERG, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Kevin Eugene Teigen appeals from a conviction of misdemeanor DWI, Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. (1)(a) (1984). He contends the stop was illegal and the trial court erred by failing to suppress all evidence and dismiss the complaint. We reverse.

FACTS

Both the motion to suppress and the allegations in the complaint were decided on the basis of a stipulation of facts.

On May 29, 1985, appellant Kevin Teigen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases