Judgment dated February 28, 1985, affirmed.
The respondent is awarded one bill of costs.
We find that the defendant's arguments to the extent they relate to the postdivorce judgment dated February 28, 1985, are meritless. In view of our dismissal of the appeal from the judgment dated August 7, 1984, we do not reach the issues sought to be raised with respect thereto (cf. Ratka v St. Francis Hosp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.