1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 41 Cal.3d
  5. 41 Cal.3d 861 (1986)
 

LINDELEAF v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BD.

Docket No. S.F. 24942.

41 Cal.3d 861 (1986)

718 P.2d 106

226 Cal. Rptr. 119

ROBERT J. LINDELEAF, Petitioner, v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent; UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Real Party in Interest.

Supreme Court of California.

May 29, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Stanley E. Tobin, James G. Johnson and Hill, Farrer & Burrill for Petitioner.

Daniel G. Stone, Manuel M. Medeiros, Nancy C. Smith and Ismael A. Castro for Respondent.

Dianna Lyons, Daniel A. Garcia and Wendy Sones for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

MOSK, J.

This case presents a fundamental challenge to the procedure used by the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (ALRB or Board) to select hearing officers and render decisions on postelection objections in union representation elections. It also calls into question the threshold requirements for compelling the ALRB to grant an evidentiary hearing on such objections.

We conclude that ALRB regulations for selecting...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases