1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 717 P.2d
  5. 717 P.2d 183 (1986)
 

HALL v. WARRINGTON

82-0674C; CA A33096.

717 P.2d 183 (1986)

78 Or.App. 381

Hubert V. and Eileen G. HALL, Respondents, v. Bill WARRINGTON, Appellant, v. E. Robert Wells and Janet Wells, Husband and Wife, and Stephen K. Pauly and Kathleen J. Pauly, Husband and Wife, Third-Party Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 9, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathryn H. Clarke, Portland, argued the cause and filed brief for appellant.

Lee Aronson, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on briefs were James C. Carter, Portland, and Holmes, DeFrancq & Schulte, P.C., Portland.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., Pro Tem., and VAN HOOMISSEN and YOUNG, JJ.

VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

This is an action for fraud in a real estate transaction brought by the purchasers against the seller.1 Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs on a jury verdict. He contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury and in receiving in evidence the written report of plaintiffs' expert witness. The dispositive issue is whether plaintiffs' complaint stated a claim for misrepresentation as to future...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases