Judgment affirmed.
The sentence imposed upon the defendant, to wit, 11 to 22 years in prison on the robbery charge and one year on the criminal possession of stolen property charge, to run concurrently with each other, was within the statutory limits (see, Penal Law § 70.04 [3]; § 160.15), and was an appropriate exercise of discretion. We therefore decline to disturb the sentence imposed.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
