1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 794 F.2d
  5. 794 F.2d 100 (1986)
 

McMAHON v. McDOWELL

No. 85-3570.

794 F.2d 100 (1986)

Patrick J. McMAHON; Walter Imhoff, Jr.; John A. Cornett; Vincent P. Dennis; Leo Dwulit; Anthony J. Iarussi; Fred Dehren; James T. Kyle; Thomas F. Lordeon; Raymond Riddle; Donald Rottman; and Frank Vento v. Putnam B. McDOWELL; W.C. Berg, Jr.; Roger F. Hutchinson; A. Limi; D.E. Huffner; W.W. Joseph; J.D. Iverson; R.J. Dobbs, Jr.; S.R. Rackoff; R.W. Smith; D.R. Andrews; E.C. Quick; D.J. Bruback; and J.F. Ries Mesta Machine Co. Appeal of Patrick J. McMAHON; Walter Imhoff, Jr.; John A. Cornetta; Vincent P. Dennis; Leo Dwulit; Anthony J. Iarussi; Fred Kehren; James T. Kyle; Thomas F. Lordeon; Raymond Riddle; Donald Rottman; Frank Vento; Charles B. Duke; Edward Hudak; Wilbur G. Beamer; Dennis Mangan; Charles Patton; Stanley Kasian; John Rhule; and Edward Zych, Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided June 24, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Silvestri, Stanley E. Levine, Lindsley Love (argued), Robert O. Lampl, Janice L. Morison, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Appellants.

Dennis R. Yeager, Jonathan Lang (argued), Yeager & Lang, New York City, Frederick N. Egler, Avrum Levicoff, Egler, Anstandig, Garrett & Riley, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Director and Officer Appellees.

Paul M. Singer, Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., for Appellee Mestek, Inc. (formerly known as Mesta Mach. Co.).

Before ADAMS, GIBBONS and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:

This action was brought by former employees of the Mesta Machine Company ("Mesta") against Mesta and certain of its former officers and directors. The plaintiffs seek wages, pension contributions, and fringe benefits allegedly owed to them under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), Pub.L. 93-406, 88 Stat. 832 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 26 and 29 U.S.C.), the Pennsylvania...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases