McCARTHY v. DEPT. OF LICENSING

No. 14694-7-I.

44 Wn. App. 848 (1986)

723 P.2d 34

HAROLD F. McCARTHY, Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

August 11, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas L. Cowan, Stephanie M. Searing, and Kinzel, Cowan & Allen, for appellant.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Gwendolyn Howard, Assistant, for respondent.


GROSSE, J.

At issue in this appeal is the adequacy of the warnings given under the implied consent law. The trial court found them adequate and upheld the Department's revocation of the appellant's license. We affirm.

RCW 46.20.308(1), in effect at the time of the arrest, requires the arresting officer to both inform the driver of his or her right to refuse the Breathalyzer test, and to "warn the driver that his or her privilege to drive will be revoked...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases