1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 186 Cal.App.3d
  5. 186 Cal.App.3d 702 (1986)
 

HOTHEM v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Docket No. A025359.

186 Cal.App.3d 702 (1986)

231 Cal. Rptr. 70

RONALD E. HOTHEM, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

October 22, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Louise H. Renne and George Agnost, City Attorneys, and Kathryn A. Pennypacker, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Appellants.

Ronald E. Hothem, Cheryl A. Isele and Hothem & Sampson for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

ELKINGTON, J.

The City and County of San Francisco and certain of its agencies (City) appeal from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandate in proceedings taken by the City under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.

Because of an apparent shortage in San Francisco of "residential" hotel rooms, the City had enacted an ordinance requiring generally that hotel rooms occupied "residentially" as of a certain date...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases