McCRAW v. STAPP

A8303-01718; CA A35921.

727 P.2d 160 (1986)

Louis H. McCRAW and Judy McCraw, husband and wife, Appellants, v. William STAPP and Kathleen Stapp, husband and wife, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 29, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen T. Janik, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Jacob Tanzer, Christopher W. Angius and Ball, Janik & Novack, Portland.

D. Kevin Carlson, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Richard A. Hayden, Jr., and Stoel, Rives, Boley, Fraser & Wyse, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

Plaintiffs commenced a fraud action against defendants on March 17, 1983. The action arose out of their purchase of an interest in an apartment building from a third party. The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment on the ground that the two year Statute of Limitations had run and dismissed plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice. Plaintiffs appeal. ORS 12.110(1). We reverse.1

Plaintiffs allege three...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases