HILL v. McDONALD'S CORP.

No. 50583.

709 S.W.2d 169 (1986)

Ernst F. HILL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. McDONALD'S CORPORATION, d/b/a Delaware McDonald's Corporation, Defendant-Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

May 6, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mastorakos, Dunne & Hennerich, Chesterfield, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Ziercher, Hocker, Human, Michenfelder & Jones, Albert A. Michenfelder, Jr., and Steven W. Koslovsky, Clayton, for defendant-respondent.


GARY M. GAERTNER, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment in this action for breach of contract. On appeal, plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because: (1) an ambiguity in the terms of the contract presented a genuine issue of material fact; and (2) application of the doctrine of equitable estoppel created a genuine issue of material fact. Finding each of these arguments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases