1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 42 Wn.
  5. 42 Wn. App. 835 (1986)
 

CAINE & WEINER v. BARKER

No. 13641-1-I.

42 Wn. App. 835 (1986)

713 P.2d 1133

CAINE & WEINER, Appellant, v. VAN BARKER, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

February 18, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Luedke & Miller and Keith D. Miller, for appellant.

Cromwell, Mendoza & Belur and Frederick Mendoza, for respondent.

SCHOLFIELD, C.J.

Linn D. Wise appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion for post-judgment attorney's fees, which he alleges were provided for in the promissory note upon which his judgment was based.1 Wise assigns error to the court's finding that the note, along with its attorney's fees provision, merged with and was extinguished by the judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases