Judgment affirmed.
The record discloses that the testimony concerning certain witnesses' fear of the defendant prior to his arrest, now urged as prejudicial, was either elicited primarily by defense counsel himself, or elicited by the prosecutor after defense counsel had opened the door to further inquiry with respect thereto.
Moreover, contrary to the defendant's contention, there was no probability that the jury could have construed the court's missing witness...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.