1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 475 U.S.
  5. 475 U.S. 387 (1986)
 

UNITED STATES v. INADI

No. 84-1580.

475 U.S. 387 (1986)

UNITED STATES v. INADI

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 10, 1986

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deputy Solicitor General Frey argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Trott, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., and Patty Merkamp Stemler.

Holly Maguigan argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Julie Shapiro and William F. Sheehan.

JUSTICE POWELL delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case presents the question whether the Confrontation Clause requires the Government to show that a nontestifying co-conspirator is unavailable to testify, as a condition for admission of that co-conspirator's out-of-court statements.

I

Following a jury trial in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, respondent Joseph Inadi was convicted of conspiring to

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases