Judgment affirmed.
On appeal, the defendant contends that the trial court improperly permitted the arresting officer to testify concerning his training and expertise in the methods of narcotics importation, packaging and sale. The defendant argues that this evidence was irrelevant and prejudicial, and was elicited solely for the purpose of conveying to the jury the notion that the defendant was a "cog" in the international narcotics trade.
We disagree. The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.