MATTER OF CONIFER BALDWINSVILLE ASSOCS. v. TOWN OF VAN BUREN


68 N.Y.2d 783 (1986)

In the Matter of Conifer Baldwinsville Associates, Appellant-Respondent, v. Town of Van Buren, Respondent-Appellant, and Board of Assessment Review of the Town of Van Buren, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided September 9, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William L. Allen, Jr., for appellant-respondent.

Charles Farrell for respondent-appellant.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE concur; Judge HANCOCK, JR., taking no part.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The Appellate Division committed no error of law in using actual income as distinct from market rents and in using actual expenses as found by it rather than as stated in petitioner's bill of particulars. Not only was there "no showing that the rents fixed by HUD do not reflect the value of the property", as that court noted (

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases