Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the court's refusal to admit a prior statement by his accomplice, who testified for the defendant at trial after pleading guilty, which was consistent with his in-court testimony, was error. Such a statement is, however, not admissible unless it serves to rebut a charge that the witness's in-court testimony is a recent fabrication (People v Davis,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.