DUCA v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES

Civ. A. No. 84-0587.

663 F.Supp. 184 (1986)

Joseph J. DUCA, Sr. and Elaine Duca v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, et al.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

September 12, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman Perlberger, Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley, Philadelphia, Pa., Mitchell S. Cohen, Thomas E. Kopil, for plaintiffs.

Arthur Makadon, Philadelphia, Pa., for Raymark Industries, Inc.

G. Daniel Bruch, Jr., Swartz, Campbell & Detweiler, Philadelphia, Pa., for Pacor, Inc.

John Patrick Kelley, Michael P. O'Connor, Krusen, Evans, Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa., for Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp.


OPINION

PER CURIAM*.

In June of 1985, a group of asbestos producers and insurers signed an agreement the purpose of which was "to provide for the administration, defense, payment and disposition of asbestos-related claims." That agreement, which is known as the Wellington Agreement, created an organization called the Asbestos Claims Facility ("the Facility"). As part of its provision for the defense of its members in the courts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases