CABAL v. DONNELLY

TC 20-803; CA A33370; SC S32733.

727 P.2d 111 (1986)

302 Or. 115

Robert C. CABAL and Julie A. Cabal, husband and wife, Respondents on review, v. William G. DONNELLY, dba Donnelly and Jenner Construction, Defendant, Herbert D. Jenner, dba Donnelly and Jenner Construction, Petitioner on review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided October 21, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Michael Alexander, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander & McCann, Salem.

Donald M. Kelley, Silverton, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief was Kelley & Kelley, Silverton.


GILLETTE, Justice.

This case presents the question whether an action by the purchasers of a new home (plaintiffs) against their builder-vendor (defendant)1 under the implied warranty that the home was fit for habitation is an action on a contract—thereby entitling the prevailing party to attorney fees under their earnest money agreement—or an action in tort—with no attorney fees awarded. The trial court ruled the case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases