1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 180 Cal.App.3d
  5. 180 Cal.App.3d 649 (1986)
 

IN RE FEIOCK

Docket No. G003512.

180 Cal.App.3d 649 (1986)

225 Cal. Rptr. 748

In re PHILLIP WILLIAM FEIOCK on Habeas Corpus.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

April 30, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Ronald Y. Butler, Public Defender, Frank Scanlon, Assistant Public Defender, Richard Aronson, Richard Schwartzberg and Mark Licker, Deputy Public Defenders, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Cecil Hicks, District Attorney, Michael R. Capizzi, Assistant District Attorney, William W. Bedsworth, Bruce M. Patterson and E. Thomas Dunn, Jr., Deputy District Attorneys, for Real Party in Interest Wife.

OPINION

WALLIN, J.

Phillip Feiock seeks relief from a judgment of contempt for failure to pay child support. His primary contention concerns the constitutionality of Code of Civil Procedure section 1209.5, which requires the court presume prima facie evidence of contempt after proof of noncompliance with a valid court order.

Feiock was ordered to pay child support for his three children as part of a dissolution action. Thereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases