1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 119 A.D.2d
  5. 119 A.D.2d 710 (1986)
 

RATEPAYERS AGAINST LILCO, INC. v. BLYDENBURGH

119 A.D.2d 710 (1986)

Ratepayers against Lilco, Inc., Appellant-Respondent, v. Donald R. Blydenburgh, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendant. (Matter No. 1.) In the Matter of Donald R. Blydenburgh, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Petitioner, v. William J. Canary, Jr., et al., Respondents, and Barbara Barnett et al., Appellants-Respondents. (Matter No. 2.) In the Matter of Donald R. Blydenburgh, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Petitioner, v. William J. Canary, Jr., et al., Respondents, and Barbara Barnett, Appellant-Respondent. (Matter No. 3.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 18, 1986

Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

There is no merit to Barnett's contention that an individual's participation at a caucus constitutes an act which will disqualify that individual from witnessing signatures on a nominating petition governed by Election Law article 6 for the same office from another party (see, Matter of Kendall v Jablonski, 84 A.D.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases