1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 181 Cal.App.3d
  5. 181 Cal.App.3d 646 (1986)
 

HELIOTIS v. SCHUMAN

Docket Nos. A028947, A027232.

181 Cal.App.3d 646 (1986)

226 Cal. Rptr. 509

GEORGE HELIOTIS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HARRY SCHUMAN et al., Defendants and Respondents. GEORGE HELIOTIS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LEONARD BERGER, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

May 28, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Modena & Royce, Vincent J. Scotto III, Tinning & DeLap, Anthony W. Hawthorne and Lawrence A. Gibbs for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, John B. Marchant, Michael G. Ornstil, Long & Levit, Ronald E. Mallen and J. Lynn Glazier for Defendants and Respondents.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

CHANNELL, J.

Appellant George Heliotis purchased a home from respondents Harry and Bessie Schuman; the Schumans' attorney, Leonard Berger, assisted. When Heliotis discovered soil damage on the site after the close of escrow, he filed a complaint for rescission, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against the Schumans and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases