1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 395 N.W.2d
  5. 395 N.W.2d 431 (1986)
 

STATE v. MILLER

No. CX-86-987.

395 N.W.2d 431 (1986)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Robert D. MILLER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 4, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Edward Starr, City Atty., Patricia Ann Rogin, Asst. City Atty., St. Paul, for respondent.

Robert D. Miller, pro se.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER and HUSPENI, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Robert Miller was convicted of violating Minn.Stat. § 169.14 (1984), relating to speed restrictions. He argues that he did not intend to commit the act which constitutes a violation of the statute and that the trial court erred in not distinguishing lack of intent to commit the act from lack of intent to commit the crime of speeding. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant was driving on Arcade Street in St. Paul when he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases