Judgment affirmed.
The defendant was not deprived of his right to confront the witnesses against him when the trial court refused to allow him to question the undercover officer regarding collateral matters upon which she had already been cross-examined, after the court determined that his questions were purely speculative and based upon groundless accusations (see, People v Batista,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
