Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly denied that branch of the appellant's motion which was to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence. The evidence adduced at the suppression hearing revealed that when Officer Cardoza approached the appellant and led him to a nearby van to determine whether an identification by the complaining witness could be made, he had a reasonable suspicion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
