RATNER v. STARK CTY. BD. OF REVISION

No. 85-737.

23 Ohio St. 3d 59 (1986)

RATNER, TRUSTEE, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. STARK COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 11, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A., Fred Siegel and Karen H. Bauernschmidt, for appellants.

John B. Wirtz, for appellees.

Teaford, Rich, Belskis, Coffman & Wheeler and Jeffrey A. Rich, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Columbus Board of Education.


WRIGHT, J.

The taxpayer argues that the BTA valuation of the mall property is unreasonable and unlawful because it does not reflect fair market value as of January 1, 1981.

This court has held that "[t]he fair market value of property for tax purposes is a question of fact, the determination of which is primarily within the province of the taxing authorities, and this court will not disturb a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals with respect to such valuation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases