Judgment affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention on this appeal, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, as we are required to do, we conclude that any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (see, People v Contes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.