1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 804 F.2d
  5. 804 F.2d 16 (1986)
 

MOTION PICTURE LABORATORY v. McGREGOR & WERNER

No. 72, Docket 86-7371.

804 F.2d 16 (1986)

MOTION PICTURE LABORATORY TECHNICIANS LOCAL 780, I.A.T.S.E., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McGREGOR & WERNER, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided October 22, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard M. Mamet, Chicago, Ill. (Paul T. Berkowitz, Colleen M. Reid, Bernard M. Mamet & Associates, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., Delson & Gordon, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Donald T. Ryce, Jr., Coral Gables, Fla. (Jesse S. Hogg, Allen J. McKenna, Hogg, Allen, Ryce, Norton & Blue, P.A., Coral Gables, Fla., Nathan J. Bayer, Kevin J. Keelan, Freehill, Hogan & Mahar, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

Before LUMBARD, OAKES and MINER, Circuit Judges.

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:

The district court for the Southern District of New York (Carter, J.) upheld the results of an arbitration between McGregor & Werner ("the company" or "M & W") and the Motion Picture Laboratory Technicians ("the union" or "Local 780"). M & W challenges the district court's ruling on venue and its holding on the merits of the arbitration. The company and union jointly submitted a dispute to arbitration. The arbitrator ruled in favor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases