1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 41 Cal.3d
  5. 41 Cal.3d 777 (1986)
 

PEOPLE v. MAGILL

Docket No. Crim. 24635.

41 Cal.3d 777 (1986)

715 P.2d 662

224 Cal. Rptr. 702

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JANET MAGILL, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

April 3, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Mark D. Greenberg, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Ann K. Jensen, Aileen Bunney and Dane R. Gillette, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

GRODIN, J.

We granted review to determine whether, under Penal Code section 1170.1, subdivision (g),1 the sentence of a defendant against whom an enhancement is imposed pursuant to section 12022.6 is unlimited by the double-base term rule (People v. Wright (1979) 92 Cal.App.3d 811, 813 [154 Cal.Rptr. 926

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases