ELLIOTT v. NAGY

No. 85-266.

22 Ohio St. 3d 58 (1986)

ELLIOTT, ADMR., APPELLANT, v. NAGY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 5, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scranton & Solze and Norman P. Solze, for appellant.

Meyer & Kocher and Douglas O. Meyer, for appellees.


CELEBREZZE, C.J.

In this appeal, appellant urges this court to reconsider its long-standing rejection of the attractive nuisance doctrine and to now adopt that doctrine in Ohio. Given the facts and circumstances of the instant case, we are not inclined to do so.

It is undisputed in the instant case that this little girl was not invited upon appellees' property and that her presence in their backyard was unknown...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases