1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 790 F.2d
  5. 790 F.2d 10 (1986)
 

TATE v. ROBBINS & MYERS, INC.

No. 85-1903.

790 F.2d 10 (1986)

Steven TATE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. ROBBINS & MYERS, INC., Defendant, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided May 7, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen R. Fine with whom Charles A. Meade and Stephen R. Fine & Associates, P.A., Manchester, N.H., were on brief, for plaintiff, appellant.

Steven E. Hengen with whom Ransmeier & Spellman, Concord, N.H., was on brief, for defendant, appellee.

Before COFFIN and BREYER, Circuit Judges, and MALETZ, Senior Judge.

COFFIN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal follows a jury verdict for the defendant-appellee Robbins & Myers in the federal district court for the District of New Hampshire. Steven Tate, plaintiff-appellant, claims prejudicial error from the district court's refusal to admit certain evidence. We find that the district court's decision to exclude this evidence was well within its discretion.

Robbins & Myers manufactured an electric industrial hoist in 1943...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases